JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 25, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Sociedad Mineros De Antioquia S.A. Vs. Dian

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente contentivo de la tutela propuesta por la sociedad mineros de Antioquia S.A. contra la dirección de impuestos y aduanas nacionales, al Juzgado Noveno Civil del Circuito de Medellín para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, toda vez que el inciso 2º, del numeral 1º, del Art. del Decreto 1382 de 2000 establece que a los Jueces de Circuito o con categoría de tales les serán repartidas para su conocimiento, en primera instancia, las acciones de tutela que se interpongan contra cualquier organismo o entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional o autoridad pública el orden departamental.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la sociedad mineros de Antioquia S.A. contra la direccion de impuestos y aduanas nacionales, al Juzgado
  2. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Medellin, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.